Welcome to BibleBum where we are exploring the entire Bible in one year to better learn how to follow God’s instructions and discover the purpose for our lives. The BibleBum blog uses The One Year Chronological Bible, the New Living Translation version. At the end of each day’s reading, Rob, a cultural history aficionado and seminary graduate, answers questions from Leigh An, the blogger host, about the daily scripture. To start from the beginning, click on “Index” and select Day 1. Take the challenge. You won’t regret it.
1 Chronicles 6:54-81
Questions & Observations
O. (Joshua 19:50): I am just paying attention to notable tidbits about the tribes and who comes from which one. I did look up which tribe Joshua came from — it had slipped my mind. It is the tribe of (drumroll, please) Ephraim, one of Joseph’s sons. I just thought that it was predictable, yet interesting and noteworthy, that he chose his own tribe to live among.
Q. (20:1-9): There sure is a significant amount of scripture given to the cities of refuge. Why were they so important? It sounds like a simple, logical idea, yet so much text is devoted to their conception. Are there any particular cities of refuge that we should make note of?
A. According to my notes, the cities were important because they prevented blood feuds between families, which would be the result of potentially endless life for life retribution. I can’t give you a really good explanation as to why they get so many verses, but it appears that the cities provided an important cog in the Israelite system of justice.
As to the cities themselves, in this area, the city of Kedesh, was not an important place at this point (it was consecrated in this reading), but the other two sites are important to note: the city of Shechem was the site where Israel renewed its covenant with God in Joshua 8. Joseph’s bones will be buried there in our next reading. Hebron — in addition to being the land given to Caleb — was among the most important places in all of Canaan, as it was the place where Sarah died way back in Genesis 23, and would subsequently be the resting place of many of the patriarchs and their wives: Abraham and Sarah, Isaac and Rebekah, and Jacob and Leah (Genesis 49:29-50:14).
On both sides of the Jordan (remember there are 6 cities total), there is a city in the north, south, and middle of the Israelite territory, in order to ensure that no one has to go too far in order to be protected.
Q. (21:2): There seems to be a lot going on at Shiloh. Is it the city where the leaders settle?
A. Yes. As mentioned, the Tabernacle is setup in Shiloh, and it will serve as an unofficial capital until David moves the capital to Jerusalem in 2 Samuel.
Q. (21:6): I don’t ever think we talked about why Manasseh split. Did they act as one tribe after the split or two?
A. Joseph’s son Manasseh got the single largest share of the Promised Land, and if we consider the Transjordan area as part of their territory as well, then their allotment is truly huge. Because of the major geographical barrier between East and West (the Jordan river), as far as I can tell, the tribes acted more like two than one. The Bible does not tell us why the tribe split in half, but it appears that some of the families of Manasseh wanted to stay in the Transjordan area, while others wanted to enter the true Promised Land.
Q. (21:43-45): In today’s society, we have expectations of immediate gratification. We want something, we charge it and hopefully pay later. In these times, God makes a promise to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and on to Joseph and Moses among all the other faithful Israelites. However, they did not get to see the Promised Land. It seems almost unjust that these men of God did not get to enjoy the fruits of their toil. Were expectations different back then? Something promised to your descendants would mean so much to you that you would go to great lengths to make it happen, and never enjoy it yourself? Or, does the Bible say anything about they are there enjoying it in spirit?
A. As the story in Genesis told us, the land was not directly promised to Abraham, but rather to Abraham’s descendants, and renewed with Isaac and Jacob. So, I think that God was perfectly up front with these men about what He was promising. It did appear to be enough for each of these men that their families — more than 400 years later — would receive the blessing that had been promised to them.
This part of the OT does not talk much about the afterlife — though it never says there isn’t one — but rather a person’s success or failure comes with having descendants who will carry on your heritage, and hopefully succeed more than you did (something we frankly all want for our kids. We just don’t always define “success” they way they do). So not only is God promising Abraham and his sons that they will still HAVE descendants in more than 400 years (by no means guaranteed), but that his family will be huge, prosperous, and able to take an entire area of land with God’s help. That sounds like an amazing promise, and I think it surely would have been enough for them to hear the ways that God would be faithful.